• Nyheter
    • Pluss-innhold
    • Arbeidsliv
    • Folk
    • Nye bøker
    • Pod- og videokaster
      • Pia og psyken
      • Psykologlunsj
      • Psykologisk salong
      • Videoer
  • Ideer
    • Ytringer
    • Bokutdrag
    • Spalter
      • Forebygg depresjon med Arne Holte
      • Fra terapirommet med Kirsti Jareg
      • Gutta fra Psykologlunsj
      • Kjærleik & liv med Anne Marie Fosse Teigen
      • Kritisk tenkning med Torstein Låg
      • Menneskets natur med Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair
      • Månedens klassiker
    • Scandinavian Psychologist
  • Aktiviteter
  • Stillinger
  • Abonnement
  • Kontakt oss
    • Annonser
    • Tekstbidrag
    • Redaksjon
Meny
  • Nyheter
    • Pluss-innhold
    • Arbeidsliv
    • Folk
    • Nye bøker
    • Pod- og videokaster
      • Pia og psyken
      • Psykologlunsj
      • Psykologisk salong
      • Videoer
  • Ideer
    • Ytringer
    • Bokutdrag
    • Spalter
      • Forebygg depresjon med Arne Holte
      • Fra terapirommet med Kirsti Jareg
      • Gutta fra Psykologlunsj
      • Kjærleik & liv med Anne Marie Fosse Teigen
      • Kritisk tenkning med Torstein Låg
      • Menneskets natur med Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair
      • Månedens klassiker
    • Scandinavian Psychologist
  • Aktiviteter
  • Stillinger
  • Abonnement
  • Kontakt oss
    • Annonser
    • Tekstbidrag
    • Redaksjon
Søk
Lukk

Scandinavian Psychologist.

  • Volumes
    • 6 – 2019
    • 5 – 2018
    • 4 – 2017
    • 3 – 2016
    • 2 – 2015
    • 1 – 2014
  • Aims and scope
  • Author guidelines
  • Advisory board
Meny
  • Volumes
    • 6 – 2019
    • 5 – 2018
    • 4 – 2017
    • 3 – 2016
    • 2 – 2015
    • 1 – 2014
  • Aims and scope
  • Author guidelines
  • Advisory board
Op-Ed

Even if the trauma is national, the grief is private

We have found that society treats the bereaved differently, depending on whether the death occurs singly or as part of many at once, write Kari Dyregrov and Pål Kristensen.

DIFFICULT BALANCE: It is sometimes assumed that grief is easier to bear after mass death because the bereaved receive much attention from mainstream society, but there are also advantages to having a more private grief, write Kari Dyregrov and Pål Kristensen. Photo: Center for Crisis Psychology.

Kari Dyregrov & Pål Kristensen

Last updated: 16.11.19  Published: 09.04.16

Citation

Dyregrov, K., & Kristensen, P. (2016). Even if the trauma is national, the grief is private. Scandinavian Psychologist, 3, e7. https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.3.e7

Abstract

Even if the trauma is national, the grief is private

After having conducted lengthy research on people who have suddenly and traumatically lost a loved one, we found that the wider society treats survivors differently, depending on whether the death occurs singly (e.g. through suicide, homicide, accident or sudden child death) or many at once (e.g. through terror, natural disaster). Whereas many seem to assume that grief is easier to bear after mass death because the bereaved receive much attention from mainstream society, there are also advantages to having a more private grief after a single death. In this paper, we discuss both the stressful and supportive aspects applicable after mass death and single death.

Keywords: bereavement, public attention, social support, traumatic death.

Author(s)

Author affiliations: Kari Dyregrov – Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway and Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway; Pål Kristensen – Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway. Contact information: Kari Dyregrov, Center for Crisis Psychology, Fortunen 7, N-5013 Bergen, Norway. Email: kari@krisepsyk.no. Received: May 26, 2015. Accepted: February 19, 2016. Published: April 9, 2016. Language: English. Acknowledgement: A previous version of this article has been published in Norwegian: Dyregrov, K., & Kristensen, P. (2016, 6 February). Selv om traumet er nasjonalt, er sorgen privat [Even if the trauma is national, the grief is private]. Psykologisk.no. This article is an opinion piece.

News article

(In Norwegian:)

Forfatterinfo

Kari Dyregrov

Kari Dyregrov er sosiolog og professor ved Institutt for velferd og deltaking, Høgskulen på Vestlandet. Hun er også professor II ved Senter for krisepsykologi, Universitetet i Bergen. Dyregrov tok sin doktorgrad på foreldre som mister barn ved traumatisk død, og deres reaksjoner, behov og tilbud om hjelp. Hun har en rekke publikasjoner på feltet.

Pål Kristensen

Pål Kristensen er førsteamanuensis og psykologspesialist med fordypning i klinisk barne- og ungdomspsykologi. Han tok doktorgrad på sorg etter tsunamikatastrofen i 2004 og rasulykken i Vassdalen i 1986.

For many years, we have conducted research on people who have suddenly lost a loved one after mass death disasters and single incidents such as suicide, homicide, accident, or sudden child death. We have found that society treats the bereaved differently, depending on whether the death occurs singly or as part of many at once. Is it true, as many seem to assume, that grief is easier to bear when it receives attention from mainstream society? Alternatively, are there advantages to having a more private grief?

The term «infernal single-grief» was used by a father, who, in a thought-provoking article in a Norwegian newspaper, described his lonely sorrow after losing two young daughters by two different modes of deaths (Kløvstad, 2015). Both he and others (Hansson, 2015) have described their own and others’ experiences after a major event, and such experiences have once again attracted much media attention. Significant events are remembered and memorized over time, assisted by governments, communities, and support associations. In contrast, one’s own «single» grief gets little attention outside the close family, especially as time passes. After experiencing a single fatality, the bereaved emphasized that it is not about envy when they express their frustration that the deaths of their loved ones happened in the same way as others (e.g., murder). Instead, they were frustrated that they are treated differently by their support system and society at large, as well as by their social networks. Some said that they felt forgotten and that their own losses seemed to be less important.

Previous research has documented that municipal services have not always been aware of those who are bereaved by a sudden single fatality. This oversight has resulted in the bereaved not receiving the necessary assistance (Dyregrov, 2003). Everyone who is bereaved needs recognition of the loss he or she has suffered. However, those who experience a single fatality may feel less supported than those who are bereaving big events (catastrophes).

Great society’s focus is both supportive and burdensome

After the terrorist killings in Utøya, we interviewed 22 parents whose children had been murdered. They explained that the great attention paid by the mainstream society had been both supportive and stressful (Dyregrov, Kristensen, Johnsen, and Dyregrov, 2015). We consider it important to describe this phenomenon in order to create a balanced argument and to show how attention from mainstream society is not always a good thing.

The extensive public empathy expressed by the King and Prime Minister in the wake of the Norwegian tragedy, with a rose parade, memorials, etc., was a great support and comfort to many. One mother said, «I felt that every soul who cried with us had an immense importance, and I have lived for a long time on this public support.» Yet there were also many bereaved who did not perceive or were not ready to receive the massive support. They were still in shock or had not yet received final confirmation of their loved one’s death.

However, they felt that they received better help from the support system because «when I say that I have lost my daughter at Utøya, everyone knows what it is. I do not need to explain anything more; everyone is familiar with the case, somehow. Had she died in an accident, I would perhaps have to explain a little more. We do not have to» (a mother).

The bereaved parents also found that the government’s implementation of systematic and proactive follow-up of municipalities, national weekend gatherings with other bereaved parents and professionals, and collective visits to Utøya were supportive measures (Dyregrov, Dyregrov, Straume, and Grønvold Bugge, 2014; Dyregrov et al., 2015). They were aware that these measures were arranged due to the event’s major scale.

When the private grief drowns in the national trauma

However, there are also stressful aspects stemming from the strong focus mass death disasters receive. Although such aspects are rarely discussed or recognized, many of the bereaved Utøya parents have had such experiences. They pointed out that while the trauma (i.e., the terrorist act) is a national matter, the consequences, first and foremost, represented a great personal grief for individuals and families (Dyregrov & Kristensen, 2015).

Furthermore, because the event and its consequences are closely linked, the personal grief of those who had lost a loved one was affected by the sustained attention associated with the event and everything that happened in relation to it. In particular, the parents described how their «personal grief [got] drowned in public noise.» They experienced a delayed grief process, partly because of the enormous media attention, the sane proportionality assessments of the perpetrator, the trial, the commission work and report, and the memorial discussions. These events did not give enough space and time for private grieving. The consequence for many was that their grief process was put on hold for the first year and, «in a way, we lived in a vacuum.»

Some parents also pointed out that because the event was a great societal concern, their private grief became public. One mother expressed it this way: «It was so hard; we had so little of the private grief in a way because everything concerned everyone. Although Johnsen on the corner did not have someone who was affected, the attack on Norway concerned everybody.» Even two to three years after the event, some parents had trouble distinguishing between what was private and what was public in relation to their grief process. One mother stated, «…In a way, I cannot maintain my private grief when there are so many other people experiencing the same thing. My child has become a crowd of deaths.» Many felt that they had no emotional capacity to accommodate everyone else’s grief. Yet they could not avoid hearing about everyone else’s pain on top of their own.

Another consequence of large events is that the media affects personal grief. After the Utøya terror, many of the bereaved parents felt that they could not personally control when they wanted to, or had the energy to, relate to their grief. One father explained, «Because it has been so public, we have also been confronted with the event and loss when we wanted to distract ourselves from it—on TV, on the radio, and in newspapers.» Another aspect of the media exposure was that everyone knew who was killed, the exact place where they had been killed, and how they had been killed. The dilemma then was that if the bereaved wanted to shield themselves from the media, they would risk their neighbour knowing more about their own child than they themselves did.

The important oscillation between dealing with the loss and the event, while distancing themselves from it and taking steps to move forward in life (Stroebe & Schut, 2010), might thus be disturbed by external circumstances beyond the bereaved parents’ control. As previous research has highlighted, it is very important that the bereaved find their own pace and way of grieving, both for themselves and their families. If one is constantly drawn into the painful images and reports in the media, the emotional burden will be so overwhelming that «…the grief work stops; it has been stopped all the time and put back, simply» (a mother). As other parts of our study show, the bereaved need to avoid and distance themselves from the constant barrage (Dyregrov, Kristensen, & Dyregrov, submitted).

All of the bereaved must be recognized and receive the necessary support and assistance

Grief processes are individual and are influenced by the various contexts the bereaved people live in. From the reports of the bereaved, we see that regardless of whether the death occurs individually or simultaneously with many others, the grief process is influenced by additional burdens or factors that may facilitate it (see Table 1).

TABLE 1: Stressful and supportive aspects of individual deaths vs. mass death.

What is crucial for the necessary support of everyone experiencing a loss is that mainstream society, professionals, and social networks understand and respect the different situations of the bereaved. Thus, professionals and networks should encourage the bereaved to alternately relate to the loss and try to move on with life (Stroebe & Schut, 2010).

We must understand and respect the different situations of the bereaved.

Empathic support, self‒help techniques, behavioural and cognitive coping strategies that provide distraction and «time-out» in everyday life, specific treatment techniques, and advice for the road ahead are all important for coping with sudden and violent deaths. Finally, family, friends, peers, the workplace, and professionals are invaluable in mobilizing the vast resources the bereaved possess.
References

Dyregrov, A., Dyregrov, K., Straume M., & Grønvold Bugge, R. (2014). Weekend family gatherings for bereaved after the terror killings in Norway in 2011. Scandinavian Psychologist, 1, e8. doi: 10.15714/scandpsychol.1.e8.

Dyregrov, K. (2003). The loss of child by suicide, SIDS, and accidents: Consequences, needs and provisions of help. Doctoral dissertation (dr. philos). HEMIL, Psykologisk fakultet. Universitetet i Bergen. ISBN 82-7669-099-8.

Dyregrov, K., & Kristensen, P. (2015). Utøya 22. juli 2011 – senfølger for etterlatte foreldre [Utøya July 22nd 2011 – Sequela for bereaved parents]. Scandinavian Psychologist, 2, e13. doi: 10.15714/scandpsychol.2.e13.

Dyregrov, K., Kristensen, P., & Dyregrov, A. (submitted). Etterlattes opplevelser av medienes rapportering etter Utøya terroren [Bereaveds’ experiences of the media reporting after the Utøya terror]. Norsk Medietidsskrift.

Dyregrov, K., Kristensen, P., Johnsen, I., & Dyregrov, A. (2015). The psycho-social follow-up after the terror of July 22nd 2011 as experienced by the bereaved. Scandinavian Psychologist, 2, e1. doi: 10.15714/scandpsychol.2.e1.

Hansson, K. M. (2015, 22 December). Til deg som ikke mistet noen i Paris [To you who did not lose anyone in Paris]. Psykologisk.no.

Kløvstad, B. A. (2015, 9 February). Vi som sørger alene over våre døde. Uten pomp eller prakt, uten konge, uten statsminister [We who are mourning our dead alone. Without glory, without the King, without the Prime Minister]. Kronikk, Aftenposten.

Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2010). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: A decade on. Omega – Journal of Death and Dying, 61, 273–289. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.4.b.

Siste saker

Slik kan vi finne ro ved hjelp av pusten

  • Hverdagspsykologi med Eirik Hørthe, Pluss

Vil forene det nyttige og det behagelige

  • Nyheter

Å være uenig med noen tar mye plass i hjernen

  • Nyheter, Pluss

Slik kan vi forsone oss med vår egen dødsangst

  • Nyheter, Pluss

Hvordan bør vi håndtere seksuell trakassering på jobben?

  • Arbeidsliv, Organisasjonspsykologi

Kan psykedelika lindre psykiske lidelser?

  • Pia og psyken, Podkaster

Arbeidsnarkomani er forbundet med flere helseplager – men det finnes en løsning på stressproblemet

  • Arbeidsliv, Organisasjonspsykologi, Pluss

Vandrende vemod og plutselig glede. Et personlig essay om å gå

  • Ytringer

Alt vi mistet i 2020

  • Organisasjonspsykologi, Ytringer

Slik forstyrrer anoreksi kroppsbildet

  • Pluss, Ukas forskning

De usynlige faktorene som ulmer på jobben

  • Nye bøker, Organisasjonspsykologi, Pluss

Konflikt mellom skilte foreldre er forbundet med økt risiko for psykiske plager hos barn

  • Nyheter, Pluss

Mest lest

– Den vanligste personlighets­forstyrrelsen er lettest å overse

    Sinte voksne barn

      Hvordan møter vi vanskelige følelser hos barn på en klok måte?

        De første tegnene på at du er utbrent

          Det gode blikket er en kur for usynlighet

            Med én enkel påstand kan du nå avsløre om noen lyver

              Når våre egne følelser hindrer oss i å møte barnet vårt på en god måte

                Slik er kjærlighetslivet med en narsissist

                  Et giftig stikk

                    Dette skjer med oss når vi opplever det mystiske fenomenet dissosiasjon

                      Når følelsene våre ødelegger for oss

                        Ni psykologer og en parterapeut avslører: Slik får du en god psykisk helse


                          Redaksjonen anbefaler

                          Vi trenger fortsatt diagnoser på psykiske lidelser

                          • Gutta fra Psykologlunsj

                          Behovet for å bli hørt i en verden som nekter å lytte

                          • Hverdagspsykologi med Eirik Hørthe

                          Gjeldsrådgivning for psykiske helse­problemer kan være ekstremt lønnsomt – en usystematisk oversikt

                          • Forebygg depresjon med Arne Holte

                          Bussen – en psykologisk
                          forundringspakke fra A til B

                          • Gutta fra Psykologlunsj

                          Vinterdepresjon, kan det forebygges?

                          • Forebygg depresjon med Arne Holte

                          Mirakla si tid er ikkje over

                          • Kjærleik & liv med Anne Marie Fosse Teigen

                          Tre råd fra Romerrikes klokeste hykler

                          • Hverdagspsykologi med Eirik Hørthe, Organisasjonspsykologi

                          En tankevekkende studie av kognitiv dissonans

                          • Månedens klassiker

                          Finnes det håp – trøst – selv under dystre omstendigheter?

                          • Hverdagspsykologi med Eirik Hørthe

                          En studie av falske minner

                          • Månedens klassiker

                          Tre råd fra en frigitt slave

                          • Hverdagspsykologi med Eirik Hørthe

                          Født sånn, eller smittet sånn?

                          • Gutta fra Psykologlunsj

                          Kari Dyregrov

                          Kari Dyregrov er sosiolog og professor ved Institutt for velferd og deltaking, Høgskulen på Vestlandet. Hun er også professor II ved Senter for krisepsykologi, Universitetet i Bergen. Dyregrov tok sin doktorgrad på foreldre som mister barn ved traumatisk død, og deres reaksjoner, behov og tilbud om hjelp. Hun har en rekke publikasjoner på feltet.

                          Pål Kristensen

                          Pål Kristensen er førsteamanuensis og psykologspesialist med fordypning i klinisk barne- og ungdomspsykologi. Han tok doktorgrad på sorg etter tsunamikatastrofen i 2004 og rasulykken i Vassdalen i 1986.

                          Meld deg på nyhetsbrev fra Psykologisk.no

                          • Psykologisk.no AS​
                            Kruses gate 8
                            0263 Oslo
                            912 389 782 MVA
                          • Tips oss
                          • Bli annonsør
                          • Bli bidragsyter
                          • Redaksjon
                          • Scandinavian Psychologist
                          • Personvern
                          • Ansvarlig redaktør
                            Pål Johan Karlsen
                          • Redaksjonssjef
                            Jonas Hartford Sundquist
                          • Markedsansvarlig
                            Vera Thorvarsdottir
                          Facebook-f
                          Twitter
                          Linkedin

                          Psykologisk.no er medlem av Mediebedriftenes Landsforening og arbeider etter Vær varsom-plakatens regler for god presseskikk.

                          Kopibeskyttet © 2021